Statistical analysis of Socio behavioral study to determine the effect of Teslar watch in healthy volunteers with non restorative sleep

Posted by

Comments

The analysis was conducted in two phases. First, statistical analyses were conducted to see if differences exist between the baseline and termination phases of the study four outcomes: (1) Sleep Phase, (2) Sleep Efficiency, (3) Epworth Scale (sleepiness) and (4) SF-36 physical and mental functioning. Second, standardized effect sizes and confidence intervals were calculated to provide a measure of treatment effect. Effect size (ES) is a name given to a family of indices that measure the magnitude of a treatment effect. Unlike significance tests, these indices are independent of sample size. ES measures are the common currency of all clinical studies that summarize the findings from a specific area of research.

Generally speaking the treatment appears to have a positive effect on all four outcomes. Statistical significance was uncovered for the measures (1) Stage-of-Sleep, (2) Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and (3) SF-36 Mental Health Subscale (p < .05). Borderline statistical significance was found for Sleep Efficiency (p <.10), and no difference was detected for SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale. Nevertheless, given the small sample size (n=10) and the fact that there is no control group, it is important to remain cautious of any interpretation.

 

Stage of Sleep

Statistical Analysis

A comparison was made for change in Quality sleep, defined as the percentage of sleep in Stage 3 and REM, between the baseline and termination measurements. The modified paired t-test (p < .01) and the Wilcoxon Sign-Rank (p < .01) tests were used and both demonstrated statistical significance. A 13.5 percent (confidence interval of 7.6% <> 19.4%) improvement in Quality sleep was noted between the baseline and termination phases of the study. All subjects reported a significant improvement in Quality sleep. Using Cohen D the standardized effect size estimate is 0.86 which is a large effect. Table 1 provides descriptive statistics for group changes in sleep stage. Table 2 provides information about subject-specific changes in stage of sleep while Graph 1 plots the changes in sleep stage by each subject.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Group Changes–Stages of Sleep

Time Statistic Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 REM Stage III and REM
Baseline Mean 12.62% 55.83% 19.62% 8.68% 28.30%
SD  7.39% 9.91% 8.68% 9.18% 17.86%
Termination Mean 8.89%  46.04% 26.81% 18.24% 45.05%
SD 7.24% 10.00% 13.06% 8.30% 21.36%
Difference Mean -3.73% -9.79% 7.19% 9.56% 16.75%
SD -0.15% 0.09% 4.38% -0.88% 3.50%

 

Sleep Efficiency

Statistical Analysis

Two analysis were conducted to look for differences between the baseline and termination measures for sleep efficiency. Overall sleep efficiency appears to improve by an average of 3.6 percent (confidence interval of -0.1%<>8.1%). A plot of the observed changes in sleep efficiency by subject shows us that eight of-the-ten persons improved. Nevertheless, both the modified paired t-test (p < .10) and the Wilcoxon Sign-Rank (p < .12) tests show no statistically significant improvement in sleep efficiency at the five percent level. If you increase the probability of a false positive (Type 1 error) to ten percent then there is evidence of statistical significance. A calculation of standardized effect (measure of treatment effect) using Cohen D is 0.33, which is defined as a medium effect. Table 1 provides descriptive statistics for the change in sleep efficiency while Graph 1 shows this change with reference to each person and overall.

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

Statistical Analysis Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores range between between zero and 24. Scale Scores from one to six indicate that patients are getting enough sleep (Zone 1). Scale scores between seven and eight are average (Zone 2). Any score from nine and up indicates a potential sleep disorder (Zone 3). To analyze this data the modified paired t-test (p < . 01) and the Wilcoxon Sign-Rank (p < .01) tests were used, and both results demonstrated statistical significance. Nine of the ten patients reported an improvement in sleepiness. Overall the intervention reduced sleepiness by an average of 3.70 points (confidence interval of 1.50<>5.90), thus taking the subjects from the Seek Medical Assistan  zone to the Rested zone. Using Cohen D the standardized effect size (ES) estimate is 0.97 which is a very large effect. An ES of 0.97 indicates that the mean at the termination point is at the 82nd percentile of the baseline point. Table 1 provides descriptive statistics for the change in sleepiness scores while Graph 1 shows this change with reference to the major cut-points.